The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Large-scale analysis of NBS domain-encoding resistance gene analogs in Triticeae
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genetics and Molecular Biology, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1415-47572014000400017 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dhia Bouktila, Yosra Khalfallah, Yosra Habachi-Houimli, Maha Mezghani-Khemakhem, Mohamed Makni, Hanem Makni |
| Abstract |
Proteins containing nucleotide binding sites (NBS) encoded by plant resistance genes play an important role in the response of plants to a wide array of pathogens. In this paper, an in silico search was conducted in order to identify and characterize members of NBS-encoding gene family in the tribe of Triticeae. A final dataset of 199 sequences was obtained by four search methods. Motif analysis confirmed the general structural organization of the NBS domain in cereals, characterized by the presence of the six commonly conserved motifs: P-loop, RNBS-A, Kinase-2, Kinase-3a, RNBS-C and GLPL. We revealed the existence of 11 distinct distribution patterns of these motifs along the NBS domain. Four additional conserved motifs were shown to be significantly present in all 199 sequences. Phylogenetic analyses, based on genetic distance and parsimony, revealed a significant overlap between Triticeae sequences and Coiled coil-Nucleotide binding site-Leucine rich repeat (CNL)-type functional genes from monocotyledons. Furthermore, several Triticeae sequences belonged to clades containing functional homologs from non Triticeae species, which has allowed for these sequences to be functionally assigned. The findings reported, in this study, will provide a strong groundwork for the isolation of candidate R-genes in Triticeae crops and the understanding of their evolution. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ethiopia | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 27 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 17% |
| Researcher | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 59% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Design | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2020.
All research outputs
#8,951,298
of 26,397,269 outputs
Outputs from Genetics and Molecular Biology
#155
of 783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,667
of 263,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics and Molecular Biology
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,397,269 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.