The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Avaliação de métodos radiográficos utilizados na localização vertical de sítios eleitos para instalação de mini-implantes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, October 2008
|
DOI | 10.1590/s1415-54192008000500010 |
Authors |
Liz Matzenbacher, Paulo Sérgio Flores Campos, Nilson Pena, Telma Martins de Araújo |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 1 | 50% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 50% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2013.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
#330
of 459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,563
of 101,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 459 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.