You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Avaliação do potencial alelopático, atividade antimicrobiana e antioxidante dos extratos orgânicos das folhas de Pyrostegia venusta (Ker Gawl.) Miers (Bignoniaceae)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Plantas Medicinais, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1516-05722011000400010 |
| Authors |
P.B. Silva, A.C.M. Medeiros, M.C.T. Duarte, A.L.T.G. Ruiz, R. M. Kolb, F. Frei, C. Santos |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 33% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2012.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Plantas Medicinais
#13
of 83 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,364
of 248,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Plantas Medicinais
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.