The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A study of Al-Mo powder processing as a possible way to corrosion resistent aluminum-alloys
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Materials Research, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1516-14392009000200016 |
| Authors |
Wilson Corrêa Rodrigues, Fidel Romel Mallqui Espinoza, Lírio Schaeffer, Gerhard Knörnschild |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 40% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 30% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 3 | 30% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 20% |
| Engineering | 2 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2021.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Materials Research
#21
of 329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,978
of 122,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Materials Research
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 329 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them