The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rehabilitation in neurogenic oropharyngeal dysphagia: sour taste and cold temperature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista CEFAC, July 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1516-18462008000200009 |
| Authors |
Paula Cristina Cola, Ana Rita Gatto, Roberta Gonçalves da Silva, Arthur Oscar Schelp, Maria Aparecida Coelho de Arruda Henry |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 22% |
| Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 12 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2012.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Revista CEFAC
#227
of 284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,368
of 95,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista CEFAC
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 284 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them