The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Afecções laríngeas, tempos máximos de fonação e capacidade vital em mulheres com disfonia organofuncional
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista CEFAC, November 2011
|
DOI | 10.1590/s1516-18462011005000126 |
Authors |
Carla Aparecida Cielo, Bruna Franciele da Trindade Gonçalves, Joziane Padilha de Moraes Lima, Mara Keli Christmann |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 18% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 9% |
Student > Master | 1 | 9% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 27% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 18% |
Linguistics | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2017.
All research outputs
#19,944,091
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Revista CEFAC
#187
of 284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,836
of 141,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista CEFAC
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 284 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.