The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fontes de óleo vegetal na dieta de cordeiros em confinamento
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, September 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1516-35982005000200040 |
| Authors |
Sandra Mari Yamamoto, Francisco de Assis Fonseca de Macedo, Marilice Zundt, Alexandre Agostinho Mexia, Eduardo Shiguero Sakaguti, Guilherme Bareia Liberato Rocha, Kelly Cristina Telles Regaçoni, Rosa Maria Gomes de Macedo |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2015.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia
#47
of 351 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,528
of 70,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 351 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.