The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Processos da vida, processos da matéria: os diferentes sentidos de natureza entre biólogos e físicos
|
---|---|
Published in |
Educacao e Pesquisa, December 2012
|
DOI | 10.1590/s1517-97022012000400009 |
Authors |
Carolina Lima Alves Belo, Eliane Brígida Morais Falcão, Flavio Silva Faria |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 40% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 20% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 20% |
Student > Master | 1 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 3 | 60% |
Psychology | 1 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2012.
All research outputs
#6,741,089
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Educacao e Pesquisa
#129
of 424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,227
of 285,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educacao e Pesquisa
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 424 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.