The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Novel penile circumcision suturing devices versus the shang ring for adult male circumcision: a prospective study
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Brazilian Journal of Urology, January 2017
|
DOI | 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2016.0204 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hu Han, Da-wei Xie, Xiao-guang Zhou, Xiao-dong Zhang |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 11% |
Unknown | 14 | 52% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 19% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 15 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2020.
All research outputs
#8,713,411
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from International Brazilian Journal of Urology
#174
of 733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,143
of 424,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Brazilian Journal of Urology
#14
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 733 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.