↓ Skip to main content

Os dinossauros de Hennig: sobre a importância do monofiletismo para a sistemática biológica

Overview of attention for article published in Scientiae Studia, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Os dinossauros de Hennig: sobre a importância do monofiletismo para a sistemática biológica
Published in
Scientiae Studia, June 2008
DOI 10.1590/s1678-31662008000200003
Authors

Charles Morphy Dias dos Santos

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 13 8%
Unknown 144 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 37 24%
Student > Master 29 18%
Student > Postgraduate 17 11%
Researcher 16 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 18 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 114 73%
Environmental Science 9 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Philosophy 1 <1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 20 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2022.
All research outputs
#6,417,749
of 23,221,875 outputs
Outputs from Scientiae Studia
#9
of 85 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,354
of 83,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientiae Studia
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,221,875 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 85 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them