↓ Skip to main content

In vitro dentin permeability after application of Gluma® desensitizer as aqueous solution or aqueous fumed silica dispersion

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Oral Science, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In vitro dentin permeability after application of Gluma® desensitizer as aqueous solution or aqueous fumed silica dispersion
Published in
Journal of Applied Oral Science, May 2011
DOI 10.1590/s1678-77572011000200011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiroshi ISHIHATA, Werner J. FINGER, Masafumi KANEHIRA, Hidetoshi SHIMAUCHI, Masashi KOMATSU

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 17%
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 15 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 63%
Materials Science 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Unknown 17 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#101
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,418
of 121,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.