The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Otoliths sagittae of Merluccius hubbsi: an efficient tool for the differentiation of stocks in the Southwestern Atlantic
|
---|---|
Published in |
Brazilian Journal of Oceanography, September 2017
|
DOI | 10.1590/s1679-87592017143506503 |
Authors |
André Martins Vaz-dos-Santos, Nayra Nicolau dos Santos-Cruz, Daniele de Souza, Aline Giombelli-da-Silva, Bárbara Gris, Carmen Lúcia Del Bianco Rossi-Wongtschowski |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 21% |
Other | 2 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 14% |
Researcher | 2 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 50% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 21% |
Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2022.
All research outputs
#8,890,680
of 26,243,859 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Oceanography
#17
of 155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,176
of 329,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Oceanography
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,243,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 155 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them