↓ Skip to main content

Asymmetric Dimethylarginine (ADMA) and Endothelial Dysfunction: Implications for Atherogenesis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Asymmetric Dimethylarginine (ADMA) and Endothelial Dysfunction: Implications for Atherogenesis
Published in
Clinics, May 2009
DOI 10.1590/s1807-59322009000500015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maurício Batista Paes Landim, Antônio Casella Filho, Antônio Carlos Palandri Chagas

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 82 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Researcher 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 20 24%
Unknown 19 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 6%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 24 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2024.
All research outputs
#21,423,812
of 26,291,905 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#880
of 1,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,537
of 106,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#13
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,291,905 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.