The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Bacteriologia e medicina tropical britânicas: uma incursão a partir da Amazônia (1900-1901)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas, September 2010
|
DOI | 10.1590/s1981-81222010000200008 |
Authors |
Jaime Larry Benchimol |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 2 | 40% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 2 | 40% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 20% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas
#115
of 370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,918
of 105,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 370 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.