The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Esthetics in Orthodontics: interest points, reference points and discrepancy points
|
---|---|
Published in |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, November 2012
|
DOI | 10.1590/s2176-94512012000500003 |
Authors |
Carlos Alexandre Câmara |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 33% |
Student > Master | 2 | 22% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 44% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2014.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
#141
of 459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,782
of 286,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 459 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.