The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Productivity and quality of potato cultivars for processing as shoestrings and chips
|
---|---|
Published in |
Horticultura Brasileira, December 2016
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0102-053620160415 |
Authors |
Thaís H Araújo, Joaquim G Pádua, Marta HF Spoto, Vanessa DG Ortiz, Priscila L Margossian, Carlos TS Dias, Paulo CT Melo |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Professor | 1 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 20% |
Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 47% |
Engineering | 2 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2020.
All research outputs
#8,784,015
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Horticultura Brasileira
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,671
of 419,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Horticultura Brasileira
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.