The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluation of Lead and Copper content in hair of workers from oil product distribution companies in Iraq
|
---|---|
Published in |
Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, January 2020
|
DOI | 10.1590/s2175-97902019000318061 |
Authors |
Ausama Ayob Jaccob |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 13% |
Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 9 | 60% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 13% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 13% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 10 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2022.
All research outputs
#8,540,769
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
#34
of 172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,899
of 473,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 172 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.