↓ Skip to main content

Comparing the financial benefits of different grain production systems in South Africa’s summer rainfall region

Overview of attention for article published in South African Journal of Science, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparing the financial benefits of different grain production systems in South Africa’s summer rainfall region
Published in
South African Journal of Science, July 2024
DOI 10.17159/sajs.2024/17091
Authors

Mary Maluleke, Nic van Schalkwyk, Anika de Beer, Hendrik Smith, James Blignaut, Jaap Knot, Gerrie Trytsman, Liane Erasmus

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2024.
All research outputs
#23,738,759
of 26,423,535 outputs
Outputs from South African Journal of Science
#1,376
of 1,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,765
of 149,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from South African Journal of Science
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,423,535 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.