↓ Skip to main content

Interdisciplinary debate in the teaching-learning process on bioethics: academic health experiences

Overview of attention for article published in Investigación y Educación en Enfermería, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 132)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interdisciplinary debate in the teaching-learning process on bioethics: academic health experiences
Published in
Investigación y Educación en Enfermería, July 2016
DOI 10.17533/udea.iee.v34n2a08
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jéssica Campos Daniel, Juliana Dias Reis Pessalacia, Ana Flávia Leite de Andrade

Abstract

The study aimed to understand the health of student experiences to participate in interdisciplinary discussions in bioethics and know the contributions of interdisciplinary methodological resource for the teaching-learning process at graduation. Descriptive study of qualitative approach in a public higher education institution of Divinópolis, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Three categories of analysis were identified: ''active methodologies in the training of a professional critic,'' ''interdisciplinary debate as facilitator reflection of bioethics'' and ''feelings and attitudes caused by the interdisciplinary debate.'' Discussion. There was a lack of approach of bioethical contents in the health curriculum, and the adoption of active methodologies provides a better reflection in bioethics, but that requires changing paradigms of teachers and educational institutions.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 17%
Professor 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 17 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 19%
Psychology 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Sports and Recreations 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 19 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2018.
All research outputs
#17,289,387
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Investigación y Educación en Enfermería
#36
of 132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,276
of 372,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Investigación y Educación en Enfermería
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.