The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Conspiracy theories and pandemic management in Africa: critical reflections on contexts, contradictions and challenges
|
---|---|
Published in |
Acta Academica, December 2021
|
DOI | 10.18820/24150479/aa53i2/2 |
Authors |
Adeolu Oluwaseyi Oyekan |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer | 3 | 38% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 25% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
Professor | 1 | 13% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 4 | 50% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2021.
All research outputs
#8,578,315
of 25,477,125 outputs
Outputs from Acta Academica
#16
of 37 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,579
of 512,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Academica
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,477,125 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one scored the same or higher as 21 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 512,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.