The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cardiac Tumors: Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.21470/1678-9741-2023-0405 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carlos J. T. Karigyo, Beatriz Mella S. Pessoa, Samuel Pissinati Nicacio, Emma Terwilliger, Philippos Costa, Pedro Reck dos Santos, Vinicius Ernani, Mahesh Seetharam, Alexandre Noburu Murakami, Felipe Batalini |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2024.
All research outputs
#20,918,894
of 26,579,895 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
#212
of 373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,344
of 273,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,579,895 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 373 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them