The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chemical Composition and Larvicidal Activity of Essential Oil Extracted from Anemia tomentosa (SAV.) Sw: Study Conducted in vitro and in silico
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society, January 2025
|
| DOI | 10.21577/0103-5053.20240127 |
| Authors |
Vilisaimon de Jesus, Juliana Leite, Jailan Sousa, Fabricio Barbosa, Djalma de Oliveira, Rubens Barreto, Wagner Soares, Bruno Andrade, Simone Gualberto, Débora da Silva, Isabelly Guimarães, Luiza Silva, Rosane Aguiar |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2024.
All research outputs
#4,594,929
of 26,370,058 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society
#32
of 1,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152
of 1,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,370,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,814 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 1,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them