↓ Skip to main content

Status of the national immunization technical advisory groups in the Americas: recommendations for improvement

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Status of the national immunization technical advisory groups in the Americas: recommendations for improvement
Published in
Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, January 2024
DOI 10.26633/rpsp.2024.63
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miguel Betancourt-Cravioto, Ruby Trejo Varón, Francisco Becerra-Posada, Carlos Espinal

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2024.
All research outputs
#21,524,499
of 26,419,306 outputs
Outputs from Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
#1,250
of 1,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,598
of 382,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,419,306 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,507 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.