↓ Skip to main content

Metodología de evaluación técnica en campo para proyectos piloto de inyección de agua

Overview of attention for article published in FIGEMPA Investigación y Desarrollo, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Metodología de evaluación técnica en campo para proyectos piloto de inyección de agua
Published in
FIGEMPA Investigación y Desarrollo, July 2022
DOI 10.29166/revfig.v14i2.3204
Authors

Bryan Sánchez Toapanta, Daniel Sánchez Cardenas, Luis Alberto Alabuela Toapanta

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2022.
All research outputs
#15,925,391
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from FIGEMPA Investigación y Desarrollo
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,020
of 440,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from FIGEMPA Investigación y Desarrollo
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them