The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hernia 3D training model: a new inguinal hernia 3D-printed simulator
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Einstein (São Paulo), August 2024
|
| DOI | 10.31744/einstein_journal/2024ao0620 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paulo Henrique Fogaça de Barros, Camila Scivoletto Borges, Caroline Petersen da Costa Ferreira, Bruno de Lucia Hernani, Iron Pires Abreu, Luciano Tastaldi, Leandro Totti Cavazzola |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2024.
All research outputs
#18,142,941
of 26,538,769 outputs
Outputs from Einstein (São Paulo)
#319
of 622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,007
of 160,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Einstein (São Paulo)
#9
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,538,769 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.