The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dynamic computed tomography angiography for noninvasive diagnosis of bow Hunter's syndrome: a case report
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Einstein (São Paulo), July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.31744/einstein_journal/2024rc0582 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giovanna Sawaya Torre, Bruna Bonaventura Failla, Felipe Soares Oliveira Portela, Marcelo Passos Teivelis, Nelson Wolosker, Rogerio Iquizli, Carlos Augusto Ventura Pinto, Marcelo Assis Rocha, Adriano Tachibana |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2024.
All research outputs
#17,402,608
of 26,308,718 outputs
Outputs from Einstein (São Paulo)
#278
of 608 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,145
of 181,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Einstein (São Paulo)
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,308,718 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 608 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.