↓ Skip to main content

Emotional processing in adult vs adolescent patients with eating behavior disorders; emotional recognizing and the mental theory.

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrición Hospitalaria, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Emotional processing in adult vs adolescent patients with eating behavior disorders; emotional recognizing and the mental theory.
Published in
Nutrición Hospitalaria, April 2014
DOI 10.3305/nh.2014.29.4.7326
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rosa Calvo Sagardoy, Luis Tomás Gallego Morales, Gloria Solórzano Ostolaza, Soledad Kassem García, Carmen Morales Martínez, Rosana Codesal Julián, Ascensión Blanco Fernández

Abstract

Current research has focused on the impact of difficulties in emotional recognition and regulation and deficits in social cognition (ToM) in the predisposition and maintenance of eating disorders EDs. Though most studies have assessed adult patients, few studies have examined these characteristics in adolescent patients. This study assessed difficulties in emotional recognition and ToM in 48 adult and adolescent patients (39 Anorexia Nervosa patients, and 9 Bulimia Nervosa patients) of varying degrees of severity, who were compared with a group of healthy controls using the TAS-20, and the RME.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 103 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 36 35%
Student > Postgraduate 11 11%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 16 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 39 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 15%
Computer Science 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 17 17%