↓ Skip to main content

Devemos Considerar a Estimulação da Guanilil Ciclase Solúvel como Benéfica para o Tratamento da Hipertensão Pulmonar Pré-Capilar?

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Devemos Considerar a Estimulação da Guanilil Ciclase Solúvel como Benéfica para o Tratamento da Hipertensão Pulmonar Pré-Capilar?
Published in
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, June 2022
DOI 10.36660/abc.20220261
Pubmed ID
Authors

Allan Kardec Nogueira de Alencar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2023.
All research outputs
#17,301,727
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#524
of 1,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,970
of 447,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#13
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,210 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.