The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Vitamin K Antagonists for Left Ventricular Thrombus: A Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.36660/abc.20230738 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eric Pasqualotto, Douglas Mesadri Gewehr, Rafael Oliva Morgado Ferreira, Matheus Pedrotti Chavez, Caroliny Hellen Silva, Sara Almeida Cruz, Jhonny Limachi-Choque, Amanda Park, Mário Sérgio Soares de Azeredo Coutinho, Luiz Fernando Kubrusly |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2024.
All research outputs
#21,618,294
of 26,538,386 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#863
of 1,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,020
of 386,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#21
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,538,386 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,262 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.