The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Wide QRS Tachycardias Management in Emergency Departments: What Really Matters.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.36660/abc.20230829 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
José Nunes de Alencar, Guilherme Dagostin de Carvalho, Renan Teixeira Campelo, Sandro Pinelli Felicioni, Matheus Kiszka Scheffer, Mariana Nogueira De Marchi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 90% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2024.
All research outputs
#4,485,972
of 26,393,142 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#103
of 1,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,325
of 381,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,393,142 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,252 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.