The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How Can We Expand Knowledge to Improve Women's Cardiovascular Health in Latin America?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
"International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences", January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.36660/ijcs.20240027 |
| Authors |
Maria Alayde Mendonça Rivera, Carolina María Artucio, Glaucia Maria Moraes de Oliveira |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Cuba | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2024.
All research outputs
#14,904,139
of 25,962,638 outputs
Outputs from "International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences"
#76
of 333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,113
of 363,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from "International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences"
#6
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,962,638 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 333 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.