The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Bioeconomic model for the evaluation of a backyard aquaculture system for tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Latin american journal of aquatic research, April 2023
|
DOI | 10.3856/vol51-issue2-fulltext-2999 |
Authors |
Juan Carlos R. Dorantes-De-La-O, Alfonso N. Maeda-Martínez |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
Researcher | 1 | 8% |
Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 25% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 8% |
Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2023.
All research outputs
#6,859,305
of 26,173,059 outputs
Outputs from Latin american journal of aquatic research
#17
of 124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,817
of 415,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Latin american journal of aquatic research
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,173,059 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them