↓ Skip to main content

Brain activation for reading and listening comprehension: An fMRI study of modality effects and individual differences in language comprehension

Overview of attention for article published in Psychology & Neuroscience, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 116)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
300 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Brain activation for reading and listening comprehension: An fMRI study of modality effects and individual differences in language comprehension
Published in
Psychology & Neuroscience, July 2009
DOI 10.3922/j.psns.2009.2.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Augusto Buchweitz, Robert A. Mason, Lêda M. B. Tomitch, Marcel Adam Just

Abstract

The study compared the brain activation patterns associated with the comprehension of written and spoken Portuguese sentences. An fMRI study measured brain activity while participants read and listened to sentences about general world knowledge. Participants had to decide if the sentences were true or false. To mirror the transient nature of spoken sentences, visual input was presented in rapid serial visual presentation format. The results showed a common core of amodal left inferior frontal and middle temporal gyri activation, as well as modality specific brain activation associated with listening and reading comprehension. Reading comprehension was associated with more left-lateralized activation and with left inferior occipital cortex (including fusiform gyrus) activation. Listening comprehension was associated with extensive bilateral temporal cortex activation and more overall activation of the whole cortex. Results also showed individual differences in brain activation for reading comprehension. Readers with lower working memory capacity showed more activation of right-hemisphere areas (spillover of activation) and more activation in the prefrontal cortex, potentially associated with more demand placed on executive control processes. Readers with higher working memory capacity showed more activation in a frontal-posterior network of areas (left angular and precentral gyri, and right inferior frontal gyrus). The activation of this network may be associated with phonological rehearsal of linguistic information when reading text presented in rapid serial visual format. The study demonstrates the modality fingerprints for language comprehension and indicates how low- and high working memory capacity readers deal with reading text presented in serial format.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 300 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Brazil 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 286 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 61 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 14%
Student > Bachelor 39 13%
Researcher 34 11%
Professor 15 5%
Other 52 17%
Unknown 56 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 84 28%
Neuroscience 34 11%
Linguistics 31 10%
Social Sciences 28 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 5%
Other 42 14%
Unknown 65 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2024.
All research outputs
#1,443,953
of 26,576,308 outputs
Outputs from Psychology & Neuroscience
#7
of 116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,146
of 125,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology & Neuroscience
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,576,308 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them