↓ Skip to main content

The occurrence of Culicoides species, the vectors of arboviruses, at selected trap sites in Zimbabwe

Overview of attention for article published in Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 258)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The occurrence of Culicoides species, the vectors of arboviruses, at selected trap sites in Zimbabwe
Published in
Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, February 2015
DOI 10.4102/ojvr.v82i1.900
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stuart J.G. Gordon, Charlotte Bolwell, Chris Rogers, Godfrey Musuka, Patrick Kelly, Karien Labuschagne, Alan J. Guthrie, Eric Denison, Philip S. Mellor, Christopher Hamblin

Abstract

A study of the distribution of Culicoides species was conducted by establishing 12 light trap sites over five rainy seasons between 1998 and 2003 covering all the geo-climatic natural regions of Zimbabwe. In total, 279 919 specimens of Culicoides were trapped over a total of 163 trapping nights. The highest median counts of Culicoides per trapping night were recorded in natural region III, which has climatic conditions conducive to the successful development of the larvae. Culicoides imicola, the major vector of bluetongue and African horse sickness viruses in Africa, was found to be the most abundant species (80.4%), followed by Culicoides enderleini (5.9%) and Culicoides milnei (5.2%). This study identified 10 species of Culicoides that had not been previously described in Zimbabwe, including Culicoides loxodontis and Culicoides miombo, which are members of the C. imicola complex. A total of 23 994 Culicoides midges were collected from five trap sites in Harare, Zimbabwe, with the dominant species, C. imicola, representing 91.6% of the total collection. Seventeen arboviruses were isolated from these midges, 15 of which were bluetongue virus. The predominant bluetongue virus serotype was serotype 11, followed by serotypes 1, 8, 12 and 15. Bluetongue virus serotypes 1, 2, 8, 10, 12, 15, 16 and 18, detected in this study, had not been previously reported in Zimbabwe.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 31 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 18%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Other 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 8 24%
Unknown 5 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 24%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 21%
Environmental Science 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Other 8 24%
Unknown 4 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research
#44
of 258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,502
of 270,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 258 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.