↓ Skip to main content

Field study to determine the reliability of HIV viral load results shows minimal impact of delayed testing in South Africa

Overview of attention for article published in African Journal of Laboratory Medicine, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Field study to determine the reliability of HIV viral load results shows minimal impact of delayed testing in South Africa
Published in
African Journal of Laboratory Medicine, May 2024
DOI 10.4102/ajlm.v13i1.2364
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diana R Hardie, Howard Newman, Joanna Reid, Nei-Yuan Hsiao, Gert van Zyl, Lucia Hans, Jasantha Odayar, Stephen Korsman

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2024.
All research outputs
#21,284,420
of 26,139,724 outputs
Outputs from African Journal of Laboratory Medicine
#101
of 139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,880
of 207,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from African Journal of Laboratory Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,139,724 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 139 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them