↓ Skip to main content

Developing Biodata for Public Manager Selection Purposes: A Comparison between Fuzzy Logic and Traditional Methods

Overview of attention for article published in Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 160)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developing Biodata for Public Manager Selection Purposes: A Comparison between Fuzzy Logic and Traditional Methods
Published in
Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, November 2020
DOI 10.5093/jwop2020a22
Authors

Antonio L. García-Izquierdo, Pedro J. Ramos-Villagrasa, María A. Lubiano

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 12 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 5 19%
Psychology 3 11%
Computer Science 3 11%
Engineering 2 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 12 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2023.
All research outputs
#15,355,414
of 26,245,314 outputs
Outputs from Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones
#49
of 160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,284
of 445,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,245,314 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 160 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.