↓ Skip to main content

Prevalent Complications in Heart Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Transplantation, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalent Complications in Heart Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Transplantation, May 2024
DOI 10.53855/bjt.v27i1.558_eng
Authors

Gabriela Ribeiro Borzani, Nadja Van Geen Poltronieri, Bruna Bronhara Damiani, Sérgio Henrique Simonetti

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2024.
All research outputs
#21,164,200
of 25,997,855 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Transplantation
#25
of 73 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,313
of 165,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Transplantation
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,997,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 73 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.8. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.