↓ Skip to main content

Tinea capitis by Trichophyton tonsurans in a pediatric patient.

Overview of attention for article published in Archivos argentinos de pediatría, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tinea capitis by Trichophyton tonsurans in a pediatric patient.
Published in
Archivos argentinos de pediatría, August 2022
DOI 10.5546/aap.2022.e192
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricia Vides De La Hoz, Melina Piccolomini, Aldana Almassio, Eugenia Abad, Margarita Larralde

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,675,798
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Archivos argentinos de pediatría
#63
of 837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,263
of 433,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archivos argentinos de pediatría
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 837 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.