The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Current Evidence and Future Perspective of Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence Application for Early Gastric Cancer Diagnosis With Endoscopy: A Systematic and Meta-Analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, March 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2021.629080 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kailin Jiang, Xiaotao Jiang, Jinglin Pan, Yi Wen, Yuanchen Huang, Senhui Weng, Shaoyang Lan, Kechao Nie, Zhihua Zheng, Shuling Ji, Peng Liu, Peiwu Li, Fengbin Liu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 4 | 10% |
Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 20 | 51% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 23% |
Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 21 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2021.
All research outputs
#14,549,452
of 23,301,510 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#2,580
of 5,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,890
of 425,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#167
of 332 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,301,510 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,970 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 332 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.