↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of Surgical Complications Rates Between LigaSure Small Jaw and Clamp-and-Tie Hemostatic Technique in 1,000 Neuro-Monitored Thyroidectomies

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in endocrinology, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of Surgical Complications Rates Between LigaSure Small Jaw and Clamp-and-Tie Hemostatic Technique in 1,000 Neuro-Monitored Thyroidectomies
Published in
Frontiers in endocrinology, April 2021
DOI 10.3389/fendo.2021.638608
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cheng-Hsin Liu, Chih-Chun Wang, Che-Wei Wu, Yi-Chu Lin, I-Cheng Lu, Pi-Ying Chang, Ching-Feng Lien, Chien-Chung Wang, Tzer-Zen Hwang, Tzu-Yen Huang, Feng-Yu Chiang

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Other 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 13 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 30%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Unknown 13 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2021.
All research outputs
#23,214,800
of 25,872,466 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#8,497
of 13,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#397,385
of 458,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#352
of 515 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,872,466 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 515 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.