↓ Skip to main content

Different Methods of Physical Training Applied to Women Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Different Methods of Physical Training Applied to Women Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, April 2021
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2021.639406
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silvia Schutz, Felipe J. Aidar, Rafael Luiz Mesquita Souza, Jymmys Lopes dos Santos, Fabrício Azevedo Voltarelli, Roberto Carlos Vieira, Nara Michelle Moura Soares, Anderson Carlos Marçal

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 129 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Other 8 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 6%
Researcher 6 5%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 70 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 21 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 74 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,326,267
of 23,275,636 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#3,521
of 13,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,491
of 435,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#149
of 482 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,275,636 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 482 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.