The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
A population-based analysis of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on common abdominal and gynecological emergency department visits
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.202821 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Gomez, Andrea N. Simpson, Colin Sue-Chue-Lam, Charles de Mestral, Fahima Dossa, Jordan Nantais, Andrew S. Wilton, David Urbach, Peter C. Austin, Nancy N. Baxter |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 7 | 50% |
| Ireland | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 50% |
| Scientists | 5 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 31 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 32 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 117. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2021.
All research outputs
#379,300
of 26,435,181 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#665
of 9,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,502
of 464,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#15
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,435,181 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 464,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.