↓ Skip to main content

A Research Agenda to Better Understand the Human Dimensions of Energy Transitions

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Research Agenda to Better Understand the Human Dimensions of Energy Transitions
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, June 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.672776
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linda Steg, Goda Perlaviciute, Benjamin K. Sovacool, Marino Bonaiuto, Andreas Diekmann, Massimo Filippini, Frank Hindriks, Cecilia Jacobbson Bergstad, Ellen Matthies, Simon Matti, Machiel Mulder, Andreas Nilsson, Sabina Pahl, Martha Roggenkamp, Geertje Schuitema, Paul C. Stern, Massimo Tavoni, John Thøgersen, Edwin Woerdman

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 118 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 25%
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Other 4 3%
Professor 4 3%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 38 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 16 14%
Psychology 14 12%
Energy 9 8%
Environmental Science 7 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 5%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 43 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2024.
All research outputs
#2,990,100
of 26,608,834 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#5,910
of 35,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,749
of 461,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#220
of 1,536 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,608,834 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,539 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,536 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.