The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effects of Choice of Medical Imaging Modalities on a Non-invasive Diagnostic and Monitoring Computational Framework for Patients With Complex Valvular, Vascular, and Ventricular Diseases Who Undergo Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, July 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2021.643453 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Melissa Baiocchi, Shirley Barsoum, Seyedvahid Khodaei, Jose M. de la Torre Hernandez, Sydney E. Valentino, Emily C. Dunford, Maureen J. MacDonald, Zahra Keshavarz-Motamed |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | 50% |
United States | 1 | 25% |
Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 3 | 75% |
Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
Researcher | 1 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 10% |
Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 10% |
Computer Science | 1 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2021.
All research outputs
#13,392,150
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#1,545
of 6,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,589
of 440,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#76
of 343 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,955 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 343 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.