↓ Skip to main content

Optimal Experience in Adult Learning: Conception and Validation of the Flow in Education Scale (EduFlow-2)

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optimal Experience in Adult Learning: Conception and Validation of the Flow in Education Scale (EduFlow-2)
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, December 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.828027
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean Heutte, Fabien Fenouillet, Charles Martin-Krumm, Gary Gute, Annelies Raes, Deanne Gute, Rémi Bachelet, Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Master 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 4 6%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 35 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 14%
Social Sciences 8 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Linguistics 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 36 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2021.
All research outputs
#18,397,742
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#22,085
of 29,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#357,400
of 497,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#894
of 1,511 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,702 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 497,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,511 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.