Title |
Optimal HbA1c cutoff for detecting diabetic retinopathy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Acta Diabetologica, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00592-013-0452-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nam H. Cho, Tae Hyuk Kim, Se Joon Woo, Kyu Hyung Park, Soo Lim, Young Min Cho, Kyong Soo Park, Hak C. Jang, Sung Hee Choi |
Abstract |
The associations between high glucose levels and diabetic retinopathy have been the basis for the diagnosis of diabetes. We aimed to provide updated data on the relationship between HbA1c and diabetic retinopathy, and to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the proposed HbA1c cutoff for detecting diabetic retinopathy. This cross-sectional study included 3,403 adults from the 2009 to 2010 Ansung Cohort Study. Retinopathy was assessed with single-field nonmydriatic fundus photography and graded according to the International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy Disease Severity Scale. HbA1c was measured by standardized assay using high performance liquid chromatography. Based on deciles distribution, the prevalence of retinopathy was very low until the HbA1c range of 48-51 mmol/mol (6.5-6.8 %). The optimal HbA1c cutoff for detecting any diabetic retinopathy was 49 mmol/mol (6.6 %), moderate or severer retinopathy was 52 mmol/mol (6.9 %) from receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The proposed HbA1c threshold of 48 mmol/mol (6.5 %) from American Diabetes Association produced comparable accuracy for identifying both any and moderate/severer retinopathy. This study confirmed that the proposed HbA1c threshold of 48 mmol/mol (6.5 %) allowed the proper detection of diabetic retinopathy. Our data support the judicious use of HbA1c for the diagnosis of diabetes and detecting diabetic retinopathy as well. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 72 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 15% |
Researcher | 7 | 10% |
Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Other | 17 | 23% |
Unknown | 20 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 49% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 22 | 30% |