↓ Skip to main content

Commentary: The Circulatory Effects of Increased Hydrostatic Pressure Due to Immersion and Submersion

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Commentary: The Circulatory Effects of Increased Hydrostatic Pressure Due to Immersion and Submersion
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, January 2022
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2022.830759
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacques Regnard, Malika Bouhaddi, Olivier Castagna, Laurent Mourot

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 38%
Unknown 5 63%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 13%
Social Sciences 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Unknown 5 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2024.
All research outputs
#2,911,923
of 26,396,170 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#1,580
of 15,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,689
of 534,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#56
of 745 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,396,170 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,850 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 534,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 745 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.