The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Development and Pilot Usefulness Testing of an Interactive Computerized Patient Decision Aid for Intraocular Lens Selection Before Cataract Surgery
|
---|---|
Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, January 2022
|
DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s343655 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chong-Bin Tsai, Chien-Liang Fang, Ming-Shan Chen, Min-Yueh Yen, Chi-Yen Yeh, Zhi-Ming Lai, Mei-Ling Hsu, Shan-Tair Wang |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 2 | 18% |
Librarian | 1 | 9% |
Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 27% |
Engineering | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 7 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2022.
All research outputs
#5,035,655
of 26,166,431 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#319
of 1,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,636
of 529,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#9
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,166,431 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,776 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 529,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.