↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of MPA designs that protect highly mobile megafauna now and under climate change scenarios

Overview of attention for article published in Global Ecology and Conservation, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
14 X users

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of MPA designs that protect highly mobile megafauna now and under climate change scenarios
Published in
Global Ecology and Conservation, June 2022
DOI 10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02070
Authors

M.E. Gilmour, J. Adams, B.A. Block, J.E. Caselle, A.M. Friedlander, E.T. Game, E.L. Hazen, N.D. Holmes, K.D. Lafferty, S.M. Maxwell, D.J. McCauley, E.M. Oleson, K. Pollock, S.A. Shaffer, N.H. Wolff, A. Wegmann

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 99 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 5 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 4%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 51 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 19%
Environmental Science 14 14%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 55 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2024.
All research outputs
#1,611,808
of 26,306,521 outputs
Outputs from Global Ecology and Conservation
#282
of 1,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,988
of 451,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Ecology and Conservation
#2
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,306,521 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,681 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.