The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 145 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Polygenic scores in biomedical research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Reviews Genetics, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41576-022-00470-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Iftikhar J. Kullo, Cathryn M. Lewis, Michael Inouye, Alicia R. Martin, Samuli Ripatti, Nilanjan Chatterjee |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 5% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Finland | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Panama | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 114 | 79% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 67 | 46% |
| Scientists | 65 | 45% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 145 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 45 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 39 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 10% |
| Psychology | 6 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 48 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 92. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2024.
All research outputs
#495,971
of 26,591,059 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Genetics
#254
of 2,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,005
of 455,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Genetics
#8
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,591,059 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.